Skip to content

Hicklin Test

The Hicklin test is a legal test for obscenity established by the English case R. v Hicklin (1868).

Version
v1 · 2026-09-28 · History
Domain-specific #
9857
Domain group
Professional & Organizational Practice
Origin domain
Law & Governance
Subdomains
Obscenity Law, English Common Law → Law & Governance

Core Idea

Hicklin Test is treated here as the recurring social sciences, humanities, and arts identity summarized by this source-grounded definition: The Hicklin test is a legal test for obscenity established by the English case R. v Hicklin (1868). The Hicklin test is a legal test for obscenity established by the English case R. v Hicklin (1868). At issue was the statutory interpretation of the word "obscene" in the Obscene Publications Act 1857, which authorized the destruction of obscene books.

Scope of Application

  • History. Hicklin held that Scott's purpose had not been to corrupt public morals but to expose problems within the Catholic Church; hence, Scott's intention was innocent.

  • In India. Amal Mitra (1985), the Supreme Court, while examining a Bengali novel, departed slightly from a strict Hicklin application and emphasized the importance of context and literary value.

  • In the United States. Although lower courts in the U.S. had used the Hicklin standard sporadically since 1868, it was not until 1879, when prominent federal judge Samuel Blatchford upheld the obscenity conviction of.

  • In India. The Hicklin test is no longer used in Indian courts.

  • History. The modern English law of obscenity began with the Obscene Publications Act 1857, also known as Lord Campbell's Act.

Clarity

A clear use of Hicklin Test names the carrier, the operative relation, and the conditions under which the source treats the identity as present. The minimal definition is The Hicklin test is a legal test for obscenity established by the English case R. v Hicklin (1868).

Manages Complexity

Hicklin Test compresses multiple social sciences, humanities, and arts details into a stable diagnostic relation. The source shows both the central mechanism—adoption of obscenity laws in the United States was largely by the efforts of Anthony Comstock, whose intense lobbying led to the passage in 1873 of an anti-obscenity statute, known as the Comstock Act.—and the practical consequence—the Act also granted authority to issue search warrants for.

Abstract Reasoning

  1. Type the carrier. Identify the social sciences, humanities, and arts entities to which the claim applies.
  2. State the relation. Use the source-grounded identity: The Hicklin test is a legal test for obscenity established by the English case R. v Hicklin (1868).
  3. Check operation and conditions. The Hicklin test is a legal test for obscenity established by the English case R. v Hicklin (1868).
  4. Demand recognition evidence.

Knowledge Transfer

Within the home domain. Knowledge about Hicklin Test transfers literally when a new case preserves the same carrier type, relation, and recognition test. Hicklin held that Scott's purpose had not been to corrupt public morals but to expose problems within the Catholic Church; hence, Scott's intention was innocent. Amal Mitra (1985), the Supreme Court, while examining a Bengali novel, departed slightly from a strict Hicklin application and emphasized the importance of context and literary value. Beyond the home domain. No canonical parent is asserted for Hicklin Test.

Relationships to Other Abstractions

Local relationship map for Hicklin TestParents appear above the current abstraction, mutual partners to the right, and children below. Node labels state whether each abstraction is prime or domain-specific; colors identify relation types.Hicklin TestDOMAINPrime abstraction: Evaluation — is a kind ofEvaluationPRIME

Current abstraction Hicklin Test Domain-specific

Parents (1) — more general patterns this builds on

  • Hicklin Test is a kind of Evaluation Prime

    Hicklin Test is a strict kind of Evaluation: its frozen identity entails the parent's defining structure while adding domain-specific restrictions.

Hierarchy path (1) — routes to 1 parentless root

Neighborhood in Abstraction Space

Hicklin Test sits in a sparse region of the domain-specific corpus (95th percentile for distinctiveness): few abstractions share its structure, so a faithful description tends to retrieve it precisely.

Family — Legal & Moral Philosophy Principles (16 abstractions)

Nearest neighbors

Computed from structural-signature embeddings · 2026-10-08