Outlier-resistant confidence intervals for location¶
An outlier-resistant location confidence interval combines a resistant location estimate with a matched uncertainty procedure and stated coverage assumptions.
Core Idea¶
An outlier-resistant confidence interval for location combines a resistant location estimate with a matching uncertainty method, target and nominal confidence level. Resistance of the center does not by itself prove that the interval retains nominal coverage under arbitrary contamination.[1][2]
How would you explain it like I'm…
Not-Fooled Middle Guess
Sturdy Middle With a Range
Robust Location Interval
Examples¶
Iglewicz and Hoaglin calculate a 95% interval of 2211.7 to 2328.1 from eleven gear-tooth strength measurements, using a trimmed center, Winsorized uncertainty and a t reference. They describe a population-mean target; whether a trimmed location has that target depends on assumptions about the population. One interval does not demonstrate repeated-sampling coverage.[1]
Mair and Wilcox report a 20%-trimmed difference of −0.11494 for Spanish and German football teams, with a 95% interval of −0.405 to 0.1751. The estimand is a trimmed-location difference, not automatically an arithmetic-mean difference; inclusion of zero does not prove equality.[2]
Boundaries¶
A robust scale statistic is not an interval by itself. State the sampling conditions, estimand, endpoint construction and nominal level. Trimming and interval coverage are distinct claims, and other robust interval methods need their own assumptions.
Neighborhood in Abstraction Space¶
Outlier-resistant confidence intervals for location sits in a moderately populated region (49th percentile for distinctiveness): it has near-neighbors but no dense thicket of look-alikes.
Family — Statistical Learning & Model Failure Modes (44 abstractions)
Nearest neighbors
- Estimator-based outlier-resistant confidence intervals for location or scale — 0.92
- Kriging — 0.86
- Location Awareness — 0.85
- Wireless triangulation — 0.85
- Neyman Construction — 0.85
Computed from structural-signature embeddings · 2026-10-31
References¶
[1] Boris Iglewicz and David C. Hoaglin, How to Detect and Handle Outliers (American Society for Quality Control, 1993), §4.5, pp. 26–27. https://hwbdocs.env.nm.gov/Los%20Alamos%20National%20Labs/TA%2054/11587.pdf registry ↩a ↩b
[2] Patrick Mair and Rand Wilcox, “Robust Statistical Methods in R Using the WRS2 Package,” Behavior Research Methods 52 (2020), 464–488. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w registry ↩a ↩b