Skip to content

Samaritan's dilemma

The Samaritan's dilemma arises when assistance intended to improve a recipient's welfare weakens incentives for self-provision, creating dependence or strategically greater need.

Version
v1 · 2026-09-28 · History
Domain-specific #
11877
Domain group
Social Sciences
Origin domain
Economics & Finance
Subdomains
Public Choice, Welfare Economics, Game Theory → Economics & Finance

Core Idea

Samaritan's dilemma is treated here as the recurring socialscienceshumanitiesarts identity summarized by this source-grounded definition: The Samaritan's dilemma arises when assistance intended to improve a recipient's welfare weakens incentives for self-provision, creating dependence or strategically greater need. The Samaritan's dilemma arises when assistance intended to improve a recipient's welfare weakens incentives for self-provision, creating dependence or strategically greater need. It hinges on the idea that when presented with charity, in some locations such as a soup kitchen, a person will act in one of two ways: using the charity to improve their situation, or coming.

Scope of Application

  • Background. In 1970 Buchanan said that the phrase "Samaritan's dilemma" was used by economists to describe how a benevolent individual or institution transfers what was intended to be short-term charity to those.

  • Background. This was part of a paper entitled, "The 'Social' Efficiency of Education", at the September 1970 meeting in Munich of the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS), in which he summarized the crisis.

  • Background. He had left the University of Virginia for UCLA briefly in response to "academic disagreement with the left-leaning administration" there.

  • Background. He described how they had "literally" burned college buildings and banks "this year in America." He cautioned that neither the "ordinary citizen nor his political representative" have the courage to force.

  • Background. Instead they allow them to live like "parasites", feeding off others without "contributing" to the well being of others.

Clarity

A clear use of Samaritan's dilemma names the carrier, the operative relation, and the conditions under which the source treats the identity as present. The minimal definition is The Samaritan's dilemma arises when assistance intended to improve a recipient's welfare weakens incentives for self-provision, creating dependence or strategically greater need.

Manages Complexity

Samaritan's dilemma compresses multiple socialscienceshumanitiesarts details into a stable diagnostic relation. The source shows both the central mechanism—in his 1975 essay, Buchanan describes how societies, like individuals, need to make courageous decisions from a higher moral perspective to resolve "social problems" by avoiding the trap of asymmetrical situations between the Samaritan and those in need.—and the practical consequence—this was part of a paper entitled, "The 'Social' Efficiency.

Abstract Reasoning

  1. Type the carrier. Identify the socialscienceshumanitiesarts entities to which the claim applies.
  2. State the relation. Use the source-grounded identity: The Samaritan's dilemma arises when assistance intended to improve a recipient's welfare weakens incentives for self-provision, creating dependence or strategically greater need.
  3. Check operation and conditions. By introducing incentives that developing countries can meet by building up natural disaster protection the effects of the Samaritan's dilemma can be effectively mitigated.
  4. Demand recognition evidence.

Knowledge Transfer

Within the home domain. Knowledge about Samaritan's dilemma transfers literally when a new case preserves the same carrier type, relation, and recognition test. In 1970 Buchanan said that the phrase "Samaritan's dilemma" was used by economists to describe how a benevolent individual or institution transfers what was intended to be short-term charity to those in need, only to find that those on the receiving end are not using the assistance to improve themselves but instead became dependent on the relief.

Relationships to Other Abstractions

Local relationship map for Samaritan's dilemmaParents appear above the current abstraction, mutual partners to the right, and children below. Node labels state whether each abstraction is prime or domain-specific; colors identify relation types.Samaritan's dilemmaDOMAINPrime abstraction: Dilemma — is a kind ofDilemmaPRIME

Current abstraction Samaritan's dilemma Domain-specific

Parents (1) — more general patterns this builds on

  • Samaritan's dilemma is a kind of Dilemma Prime

    The Samaritan's dilemma is a dilemma in which assistance weakens incentives for self-provision.

Hierarchy paths (5) — routes to 5 parentless roots

Neighborhood in Abstraction Space

Samaritan's dilemma sits in a sparse region of the domain-specific corpus (84th percentile for distinctiveness): few abstractions share its structure, so a faithful description tends to retrieve it precisely.

Family — Moral & Political Concepts (9 abstractions)

Nearest neighbors

Computed from structural-signature embeddings · 2026-10-08