The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice¶
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Procedural Fairness (Due Process)
- Lind and Tyler (1988) document empirically that voice (the hearing element) is a robust driver of perceived legitimacy across adjudicative settings, suggesting it is often the highest-leverage investment.
This sourceSynthesizes experimental and field evidence that perceived procedural fairness—particularly voice, neutrality, and dignified treatment—shapes acceptance of authority and outcomes across legal, organizational, and political contexts; canonical statement of the "group-value" model of procedural justice.
- Lind and Tyler (1988) document empirically that voice (the hearing element) is a robust driver of perceived legitimacy across adjudicative settings, suggesting it is often the highest-leverage investment.
Mechanisms¶
- Redistribution Review
- Its strength is that it can correct imbalances of authority and status, not only of countable load, because a legitimate body is making an owned decision rather than a rule firing; its recorded reasoning gives the correction procedural fairness, which is what makes those affected accept it.
This sourceShows that perceived procedural fairness promotes acceptance of decisions and deference to authorities.
- Its strength is that it can correct imbalances of authority and status, not only of countable load, because a legitimate body is making an owned decision rather than a rule firing; its recorded reasoning gives the correction procedural fairness, which is what makes those affected accept it.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:001541b1a033 · see in the full table