The Security Architecture of the Chromium Browser¶
Barth, A., Jackson, C., Reis, C., & Team, G. C. (2008). The Security Architecture of the Chromium Browser.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Innovation Sandbox
- The asymmetric permeability is engineered explicitly: rendered output and structured messages flow out to the host through a narrow, validated IPC channel (so the host learns the result), but the renderer's consequences — disk writes, raw network calls — cannot cross without passing through a broker that reviews each request against policy.
This sourceDescribes the multi-process browser sandbox: a confined renderer brokering disk and network access through a validated channel.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Confirms the sandboxed renderer reaches disk, network and the screen only via the browser kernel API, which mediates and tracks granted privileges; it does not describe an IPC channel or per-request policy review in those words.
“The sandbox restricts the rendering engine’s ability to in- teract directly with the underlying operating system. To ac- cess operating system functionality, such as user interaction, persistent storage, and networking, the rendering engine re- lies on the browser kernel API.”
- The asymmetric permeability is engineered explicitly: rendered output and structured messages flow out to the host through a narrow, validated IPC channel (so the host learns the result), but the renderer's consequences — disk writes, raw network calls — cannot cross without passing through a broker that reviews each request against policy.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:00afd93ff426 · see in the full table