Zerocash¶
Ben Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E., & Virza, M. (2014). Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin. IEEE, 459-474.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Fault Tolerance
This sourceDecentralized anonymous payment scheme using zk-SNARKs. Bibliography-only entry, not cited in the body and topically unrelated to fault tolerance (likely a stray entry).
- Zero Knowledge Proof
- Cryptography: zk-SNARKs and zk-STARKs power privacy-preserving blockchains, anonymous credentials, and verifiable computation.
This sourceDemonstrates zk-SNARKs powering a privacy-preserving blockchain — the applied verifiable-computation/anonymous-payment use of zero-knowledge.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Zerocash shows zk-SNARKs underpinning a privacy-preserving Bitcoin-style ledger; it says nothing about zk-STARKs, anonymous credentials or verifiable computation as applications.
“uses zero-knowledge Succinct Non-interactive ARguments of Knowledge (zk-SNARKs)”
- Cryptography: zk-SNARKs and zk-STARKs power privacy-preserving blockchains, anonymous credentials, and verifiable computation.
Mechanisms¶
- Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proof
- The proof reveals which note or how much was moved to no one.
This sourceStates that Zerocash payment proofs reveal neither the spent note nor the transferred amount.
- The proof reveals which note or how much was moved to no one.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:00f761b835d2 · see in the full table