Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis¶
McSweeney. (2002). Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis. Human Relations.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Intercultural Communication
- The Hofstede dimensions in particular are widely critiqued for nation-as-culture conflation and for exactly this variance problem
This sourceThe critique challenging the assumptions behind Hofstede's claim to have uncovered the secrets of entire national cultures and questioning systematically causal national cultures.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“Geert Hofstede’s legendary national culture research is critiqued. Crucial assumptions which underlie his claim to have uncovered the secrets of entire national cultures are described and challenged. The plausibility of systematically causal national cultures is questioned.”
- The Hofstede dimensions in particular are widely critiqued for nation-as-culture conflation and for exactly this variance problem
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:01174aabc2f6 · see in the full table