Infringement of patent¶
Infringement of patent.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Doctrine of Repair and Reconstruction
- Because 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) makes unauthorized “making” an act of infringement, reconstruction can infringe even though the actor owns old components and even though none of the replaced components is separately patented
This sourceSupplies the statutory rule that unauthorized making of a patented invention is an act of infringement. The two qualifications that follow it — that reconstruction can infringe although the actor owns the old components, and although none of the replaced components is separately patented — come from Aro, cited with it on the same sentence.
- Because 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) makes unauthorized “making” an act of infringement, reconstruction can infringe even though the actor owns old components and even though none of the replaced components is separately patented
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:02973c3b119b · see in the full table