Trade, Growth and the Environment¶
Copeland, B., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). Trade, Growth and the Environment.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Risk Transfer Without Reduction
- . Wildfire defence — fuel breaks and defensible-space rules protecting one wildland-urban interface displace ignition to adjacent unprotected interfaces, and insurance withdrawal pushes risk-bearing onto residents of less-protected zones. Pollution and environmental justice — regulatory stringency measurably shifts where polluting plants locate and how pollution-intensive goods trade, so tightening rules in one jurisdiction can relocate emissions rather than eliminate them, while the stronger claim that trade liberalisation systematically drives dirty industry into weakly regulated countries remains, on the survey evidence, unsupported
This sourceThe survey draws exactly this distinction: the evidence supports a pollution haven effect — 'the stringency of pollution regulations does affect plant location and trade flows' — while 'there remains ... little convincing evidence to support the pollution haven hypothesis' that trade liberalisation shifts pollution-intensive industry into weakly regulated countries.
SupportedVerified against the source
- . Wildfire defence — fuel breaks and defensible-space rules protecting one wildland-urban interface displace ignition to adjacent unprotected interfaces, and insurance withdrawal pushes risk-bearing onto residents of less-protected zones. Pollution and environmental justice — regulatory stringency measurably shifts where polluting plants locate and how pollution-intensive goods trade, so tightening rules in one jurisdiction can relocate emissions rather than eliminate them, while the stronger claim that trade liberalisation systematically drives dirty industry into weakly regulated countries remains, on the survey evidence, unsupported
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:02b66b413df7 · see in the full table