The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Their Energy, Land Use, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Implications¶
Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., et al. (2017). The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Their Energy, Land Use, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Implications: An Overview. Global Environmental Change, 153-168.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Backcasting
- Linear backcasts can miss these feedbacks; more sophisticated approaches use system-dynamics modeling or agent-based simulation to layer feedback onto the backcast structure—an approach exemplified in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) framework Riahi et al. (2017) developed for integrated climate-economy modeling.
This sourceEstablishes the SSP framework integrating socioeconomic narratives with quantified emissions pathways.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Confirms the SSPs as an integrated climate scenario framework developed by Riahi et al., but says nothing about system-dynamics or agent-based simulation layering feedback onto backcasts.
“The SSPs are part of a new scenario framework, established by the climate change research community in order to facilitate the integrated analysis of future climate impacts, vulnerabilities, adaptation, and mitigation.”
- Linear backcasts can miss these feedbacks; more sophisticated approaches use system-dynamics modeling or agent-based simulation to layer feedback onto the backcast structure—an approach exemplified in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) framework Riahi et al. (2017) developed for integrated climate-economy modeling.
- Scenario Planning
- Traditional sensitivity analysis varied one parameter at a time; the company recognized that the interactions between these parameters were strategically critical, mirroring the multi-driver Shared Socioeconomic Pathways framework formalized by Riahi et al. (2017) for energy-emission scenario construction.
This sourceEstablishes the SSP framework integrating socioeconomic narratives with quantified emissions pathways; demonstrates how scenario logic and feedback modeling combine to support backcasting from climate-policy targets.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Riahi et al. (2017) presents the SSPs as a multi-driver scenario framework covering energy, land use and emissions, but says nothing about one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis or any company's recognition of parameter interactions.
“The SSPs are part of a new scenario framework, established by the climate change research community in order to facilitate the integrated analysis of future climate impacts, vulnerabilities, adaptation, and mitigation.”
- Traditional sensitivity analysis varied one parameter at a time; the company recognized that the interactions between these parameters were strategically critical, mirroring the multi-driver Shared Socioeconomic Pathways framework formalized by Riahi et al. (2017) for energy-emission scenario construction.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:036e2da86f1a · see in the full table