Causal Attribution Across Cultures¶
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal Attribution Across Cultures: Variation and Universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 47-63.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Fundamental Attribution Error
- It is not universally applicable across cultures —
This sourceMeta-analytic cross-cultural review; East Asians less likely to show correspondence bias / dispositional preference, though dispositional thinking is not absent.
Borderline supportVerified against the publisher's abstract
The review's own abstract reports cross-cultural evidence that East Asians are less likely to show the correspondence bias, so the FAE is not universal.
“Growing cross-cultural evidence suggests that East Asians are less likely to show the correspondence bias, or a preference for explanations of behavior in terms of traits, dispositions, or other internal attributes of the target.”
Two runs of the same check disagreed on this citation; the later verdict is shown and the citation is queued for review.
- It is not universally applicable across cultures —
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 borderline. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:03c25dd59dd7 · see in the full table