Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.

(1929). Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.

Type

Court case

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1929

Link

no authoritative link yet

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Domain-specific

• Mitigation of Damages
  • A repudiated construction contract may require the contractor to stop adding avoidable performance costs; Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge is the classic American illustration.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:043e65135a7c · see in the full table