Re-Visioning Psychology¶
Hillman, J. (1975). Re-Visioning Psychology.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Archetype
- T1 — Universality vs. cultural-specificity tension. Strong claims that archetypes are universal human cognitive structures (Jung in some interpretations, Campbell in some readings) overstate the evidence; many apparent universals turn out on closer analysis to reflect cultural diffusion (the Hero's journey structure migrated along trade routes and through colonialism), documented shared ancestry of specific traditions (Indo-European mythologies share deep structural similarities due to common origin), or confirmation bias in pattern identification (researchers selectively cite examples that fit the archetype while downplaying counterexamples and culturally-specific narrative forms).
This sourceHarper & Row. Post-Jungian critique reframing archetypal psychology and de-literalizing fixed archetypal images; supports the general point that strong archetypal-universality claims are contestable (marker 014). Does not itself establish the specific empirical claims (trade-route diffusion, Indo-European shared ancestry, confirmation bias) the T1 prose attaches to it.
- T1 — Universality vs. cultural-specificity tension. Strong claims that archetypes are universal human cognitive structures (Jung in some interpretations, Campbell in some readings) overstate the evidence; many apparent universals turn out on closer analysis to reflect cultural diffusion (the Hero's journey structure migrated along trade routes and through colonialism), documented shared ancestry of specific traditions (Indo-European mythologies share deep structural similarities due to common origin), or confirmation bias in pattern identification (researchers selectively cite examples that fit the archetype while downplaying counterexamples and culturally-specific narrative forms).
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:056000a8813f · see in the full table