Making Sense of Palaeoclimate Sensitivity.¶
PALAEOSENS Project Members. (2012). Making Sense of Palaeoclimate Sensitivity. Nature, 491, 683-691.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Calibration Anomaly
- Climate modelling sees paleoclimate reconstructions diverge from model hindcasts in specific epochs, driving revision of sensitivity estimates.
This sourceReconciles paleoclimate reconstructions and model estimates of climate sensitivity, driving revision of sensitivity estimates.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract offers a stricter method for intercomparing palaeoclimate sensitivity estimates; it never reports reconstructions diverging from model hindcasts in specific epochs.
“Many palaeoclimate studies have quantified pre-anthropogenic climate change to calculate climate sensitivity (equilibrium temperature change in response to radiative forcing change), but a lack of consistent methodologies produces a wide range of estimates and hinders comparability of results. Here we present a stricter approach, to improve intercomparison of palaeoclimate sensitivity estimates in a manner …”
- Climate modelling sees paleoclimate reconstructions diverge from model hindcasts in specific epochs, driving revision of sensitivity estimates.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:06753260b0e6 · see in the full table