Why Don't Software Developers Use Static Analysis Tools to Find Bugs?¶
Johnson, B., Song, Y., Murphy-Hill, E., & Bowdidge, R. (2013). Why Don't Software Developers Use Static Analysis Tools to Find Bugs?. 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 672-681.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Linting or Validation Rule
- The discipline that guards against this is to make every rule earn its place with true- and false-positive tests, and to remove or repair rules that are chronically suppressed rather than leaving them as ambient noise.
This sourceFinds that false positives and warning presentation can cause developers to disregard static-analysis warnings.
- The discipline that guards against this is to make every rule earn its place with true- and false-positive tests, and to remove or repair rules that are chronically suppressed rather than leaving them as ambient noise.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:07401f8dcab1 · see in the full table