De la connaissance historique¶
Marrou, H. (1954). De la connaissance historique.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Comparative Method
- The epistemological difference between comparative method and narrative-driven history (which assembles multiple cases without formal comparative logic) was clarified by Henri Marrou in De la connaissance historique (1954), who argued that systematic comparison requires the researcher to declare and defend case-selection criteria in advance, rendering the method transparent and replicable in ways that post-hoc analogical reasoning is not.
This sourceMethodological treatise arguing that systematic comparison requires explicit, defended case-selection criteria declared in advance — supports the claim distinguishing comparative method from post-hoc analogical reasoning.
- The epistemological difference between comparative method and narrative-driven history (which assembles multiple cases without formal comparative logic) was clarified by Henri Marrou in De la connaissance historique (1954), who argued that systematic comparison requires the researcher to declare and defend case-selection criteria in advance, rendering the method transparent and replicable in ways that post-hoc analogical reasoning is not.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:07674e679520 · see in the full table