De la connaissance historique¶
Marrou, H. (1954). De la connaissance historique.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Comparative Method
- The epistemological difference between comparative method and narrative-driven history (which assembles multiple cases without formal comparative logic) was clarified by Henri Marrou in De la connaissance historique (1954), who argued that systematic comparison requires the researcher to declare and defend case-selection criteria in advance, rendering the method transparent and replicable in ways that post-hoc analogical reasoning is not.
This sourceMethodological treatise arguing that systematic comparison requires explicit, defended case-selection criteria declared in advance — supports the claim distinguishing comparative method from post-hoc analogical reasoning.
- The epistemological difference between comparative method and narrative-driven history (which assembles multiple cases without formal comparative logic) was clarified by Henri Marrou in De la connaissance historique (1954), who argued that systematic comparison requires the researcher to declare and defend case-selection criteria in advance, rendering the method transparent and replicable in ways that post-hoc analogical reasoning is not.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:07674e679520 · see in the full table