Is the Test of Senior Friendly / Child Resistant Packaging Ethical?¶
Bix, L., De La Fuente, J., Pimple, K. D., & Kou, E. (2009). Is the Test of Senior Friendly / Child Resistant Packaging Ethical?. Health Expectations, 12(3), 322-331.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Designed-Out Misuse
- A speed bump that also wrecks ambulances, or a cap so stiff that arthritic adults cannot open it, has collapsed into uniform restriction
This sourceDocuments the degraded uniform-restriction failure mode — child-resistant closures that elderly and arthritic adults cannot open — where the burden meant for the misuse path falls on legitimate users.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Bix et al. document that older consumers struggle to open child-resistant packaging, but say nothing of speed bumps or of 'uniform restriction' as a failure mode.
“studies that have been done since the 1995 revision indicate that seniors continue to have difficulty with CR packages.”
- A speed bump that also wrecks ambulances, or a cap so stiff that arthritic adults cannot open it, has collapsed into uniform restriction
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:07ef8f0442bf · see in the full table