Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences¶
Fehr, & Camerer. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Dictator Game
- . Cross-cultural anthropology / economics — Henrich et al.'s runs across fifteen small-scale societies, using dictator variants to test whether allocation norms track market integration rather than a universal human fairness norm. Development economics and policy evaluation — dictator-style transfer protocols measuring social capital, group identity, and the effect of interventions on community-level other-regarding behavior. Neuroeconomics — allocations correlated with medial-prefrontal, anterior-insula, and temporoparietal activation
This sourceA review reporting that altruistic, fair and trusting behaviours are consistently associated with reward-related brain areas such as the striatum and with prefrontal activity implicated in cognitive control.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“These behaviors are consistently associated with activation in reward-related brain areas, such as the striatum, and with prefrontal activity implicated in cognitive control”
- . Cross-cultural anthropology / economics — Henrich et al.'s runs across fifteen small-scale societies, using dictator variants to test whether allocation norms track market integration rather than a universal human fairness norm. Development economics and policy evaluation — dictator-style transfer protocols measuring social capital, group identity, and the effect of interventions on community-level other-regarding behavior. Neuroeconomics — allocations correlated with medial-prefrontal, anterior-insula, and temporoparietal activation
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:080bd14af621 · see in the full table