Reconciling Modern Machine-Learning Practice and the Classical Bias–Variance Trade-off.¶
Belkin, M., Hsu, D., Ma, S., & Mandal, S. (2019). Reconciling Modern Machine-Learning Practice and the Classical Bias–Variance Trade-off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(32), 15849-15854.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Grain of Analysis
- Categorical classification and neural architecture: class boundaries and parameter counts set grain; over-stratification destroys statistical leverage, under-stratification destroys substantive resolution, and the double-descent literature concerns non-monotone grain–performance relations.
This sourceDocuments the double-descent curve, a non-monotone relation between model capacity (grain) and generalization performance.
- Categorical classification and neural architecture: class boundaries and parameter counts set grain; over-stratification destroys statistical leverage, under-stratification destroys substantive resolution, and the double-descent literature concerns non-monotone grain–performance relations.
- Overfitting
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:08119f7f4e3a · see in the full table