Establishing Dependability and Confirmability in Naturalistic Inquiry Through an Audit¶
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing Dependability and Confirmability in Naturalistic Inquiry Through an Audit.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Case Selection Audit Trail
- Its strength is defeating post-hoc rationalization: a locked chronology is what lets an inquiry claim its selection was reasoned in advance rather than fitted to results, and it is the operational backbone of confirmability.
This sourceERIC ED216019. (1982). Makes a documented audit trail of data, methodological decisions, changes, and reflexive reasoning the practical basis for assessing confirmability.
- Its strength is defeating post-hoc rationalization: a locked chronology is what lets an inquiry claim its selection was reasoned in advance rather than fitted to results, and it is the operational backbone of confirmability.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:082d80b1cbef · see in the full table