Regulatory Accretion¶
Miller, S. E., & Dudley, S. E. (2016). Regulatory Accretion: Causes and Possible Remedies. Administrative Law Review Accord, 67, 1-24.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Intervention Stack Accretion
- In regulatory and legal codes, successive administrations and constituency demands add rules, and sunset clauses exist precisely because the default trajectory is monotonic accretion, documented in tax codes, financial regulation, environmental permitting, and occupational licensing.
This sourceDocuments how regulatory codes accumulate monotonically because retrospective review is weak, and analyzes sunset/review mechanisms as the deliberate inverse to the accretion ratchet.
- In regulatory and legal codes, successive administrations and constituency demands add rules, and sunset clauses exist precisely because the default trajectory is monotonic accretion, documented in tax codes, financial regulation, environmental permitting, and occupational licensing.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:09b67d9b5e70 · see in the full table