Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)¶
(1963). Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Conditional Access
- The model's prediction — that a defendant with a poor outside option will accept a package they would refuse if their trial prospects were better — explains why the structural remedy is to improve the outside option: adequately funded public defenders and meaningful appellate review raise W and shrink the exploitable gap.
This sourceEstablishes the indigent defendant's Sixth/Fourteenth Amendment right to appointed counsel — the foundation of public-defense provision and appellate review that improve a defendant's outside option (raising W) in plea bargaining.
- The model's prediction — that a defendant with a poor outside option will accept a package they would refuse if their trial prospects were better — explains why the structural remedy is to improve the outside option: adequately funded public defenders and meaningful appellate review raise W and shrink the exploitable gap.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:09ffd2a04a94 · see in the full table