Wonderful Life¶
Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. W. W. Norton.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Critical Juncture
- Reversing speciation is effectively impossible: the species cannot be recombined — Gould (1989), in his "replay the tape" thought experiment, argues that such evolutionary contingencies would not recur identically if history were rerun.
This sourceThe "replay the tape" thought experiment argues evolutionary outcomes are radically contingent — rerunning history would not reproduce the same lineages; supports the speciation-contingency / non-recurrence claim.
- Reversing speciation is effectively impossible: the species cannot be recombined — Gould (1989), in his "replay the tape" thought experiment, argues that such evolutionary contingencies would not recur identically if history were rerun.
- Design Patterns
- Design patterns instantiate a general principle: solution-template abstraction replicates across domains wherever structured knowledge is transmitted.
This sourceExamines the Burgess Shale's record of disparate body plans and the role of contingency in evolutionary history. Cited inline in §8 (tier B). NOTE: Gould's central thesis stresses contingency/non-repeatability rather than convergence; see prose flag.
- Design patterns instantiate a general principle: solution-template abstraction replicates across domains wherever structured knowledge is transmitted.
Mechanisms¶
- Replicate-Foundation Experiment
- Its strength is that it distinguishes contingent from robust outcomes with evidence rather than argument — the "replaying the tape of life" question of whether a different start yields a different end.
This sourceFrames evolutionary contingency by asking whether replaying the tape of life would yield a different outcome.
- Its strength is that it distinguishes contingent from robust outcomes with evidence rather than argument — the "replaying the tape of life" question of whether a different start yields a different end.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
- https://books.google.com/books?id=SjpSkzjIzfsC ×1
- https://openlibrary.org/books/OL2058366M/Wonderful_life ×1
Registry ID ref:0a2d4d090c66 · see in the full table