REVIEW: An Overview of the Environmental Risks Posed by Neonicotinoid Insecticides.¶
Goulson, D. (2013). REVIEW: An Overview of the Environmental Risks Posed by Neonicotinoid Insecticides. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4), 977-987.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Bycatch
- Spam filtering and content moderation: a filter trained to remove prohibited content also removes legitimate messages that resemble the selector — false positives that rarely appear on the dashboard. Pharmacology and agriculture: a drug aimed at one receptor also acts on similar targets (off-target binding, microbiome disruption), and a pesticide aimed at a pest also kills pollinators, beneficial insects, and soil microbes.
This sourceReviews non-target harm to pollinators, soil and aquatic invertebrates, and beneficial insects from broad-spectrum (neonicotinoid) pesticide application.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Supports the pesticide half: neonicotinoids likely harm non-target pollinators, beneficial organisms and soil invertebrates; says nothing on drugs or spam filters.
“current use of neonicotinoids is likely to be impacting on a broad range of non-target taxa including pollinators and soil and aquatic invertebrates”
- Spam filtering and content moderation: a filter trained to remove prohibited content also removes legitimate messages that resemble the selector — false positives that rarely appear on the dashboard. Pharmacology and agriculture: a drug aimed at one receptor also acts on similar targets (off-target binding, microbiome disruption), and a pesticide aimed at a pest also kills pollinators, beneficial insects, and soil microbes.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0a42dfc9722d · see in the full table