The apportionment of human diversity¶
Lewontin, R. C. (1972). The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Primes¶
- Diversity
- These are independent dimensions, as Lewontin (1972) demonstrated in his classic apportionment of human genetic diversity, finding most variation lies within populations rather than between them.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Lewontin's abstract frames the question as the relative importance of intragroup versus intergroup variation but does not state the finding that most variation lies within populations.
“What has changed during the evolution of scientific thought, and is still changing, is our perception of the relative importance and extent of intragroup as opposed to intergroup variation.”
- These are independent dimensions, as Lewontin (1972) demonstrated in his classic apportionment of human genetic diversity, finding most variation lies within populations rather than between them.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0a7af977c44f · see in the full table