R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja and ex parte Khera¶
(1983). R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja and ex parte Khera.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Jurisdictional fact
- If the official action is properly challenged, a court can determine whether the criterion exists rather than treating the administrator's opinion as the legally conclusive condition.
This sourceThe report title joins the two applications with a semicolon. Full judgment reproduced by UNHCR Refworld; see especially Lord Fraser's speech on the illegal-entrant precedent condition and Lord Scarman's separate reasoning.
- If the official action is properly challenged, a court can determine whether the criterion exists rather than treating the administrator's opinion as the legally conclusive condition.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0b44420b7cf7 · see in the full table