Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation¶
Marder, & Calabrese. (1996). Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation. Physiological Reviews.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Central Pattern Generator
- The defining structural commitment is endogenous rhythm generation: the circuit produces its rhythmic output by virtue of its own intrinsic membrane properties and synaptic architecture, demonstrated experimentally by the persistence of rhythm in fictive locomotion preparations — isolated spinal cords or brainstem segments, deafferented (sensory inputs severed) and decerebrate (cerebrum removed, with the vestibulospinal and reticulospinal tracts spared) — in which rhythmic motor-neuron output continues without any patterned input
This sourceReview establishing that rhythmic movements are produced by central pattern-generating networks whose output is shaped by, but not paced by, sensory and neuromodulatory inputs. Review of cellular, circuit and computational analyses of rhythm generation in invertebrate and vertebrate nervous systems.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The defining structural commitment is endogenous rhythm generation: the circuit produces its rhythmic output by virtue of its own intrinsic membrane properties and synaptic architecture, demonstrated experimentally by the persistence of rhythm in fictive locomotion preparations — isolated spinal cords or brainstem segments, deafferented (sensory inputs severed) and decerebrate (cerebrum removed, with the vestibulospinal and reticulospinal tracts spared) — in which rhythmic motor-neuron output continues without any patterned input
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0bd364a0c7b2 · see in the full table