The Forms and Limits of Adjudication.

Fuller, L. L., & Winston, K. I. (1978). The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92(2), 353-409.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1978

DOI

10.2307/1340368

Link

https://www.jstor.org/stable/1340368

Cited from

law_governance, military_strategic_studies

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)

  • This sourceDefines adjudication as a distinctive mode of social ordering in which affected parties present proofs and reasoned arguments to a third-party decider whose judgment is constrained by them — directly supports the Core-Idea definition (D49-001).

• Red Teaming In Strategy
  • Red teaming is dual to the role of an advocate: just as adversarial legal systems install both prosecution and defence to expose what each alone would miss, red teaming installs an opponent within an institution whose default is consensus, and the same dual structure recurs in peer review, in notice-and-comment rule-making, and in legislative opposition; where the dual is missing — single-party planning, internal-only review — the structural prediction is that the failures the dual would have caught will land in production.

    This sourceAnalyzes the adversary system as a dual structure installing opposed advocates so each exposes what the other would miss.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

• https://doi.org/10.2307/1340368 ×1

Registry ID ref:0c2a11f03e04 · see in the full table