XML Schema Part 1¶
World Wide Web Consortium. (2004). XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Template Instantiation
- A slot may be required, optional, or repeatable, and a template admitting a list of beneficiaries or an unbounded number of experimental replicates is not thereby less of a template; what dissolves the construct is a position whose admissible fillings are decided afresh on every use, because then nothing has been reused except an inclination.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
XML Schema shows slots whose occurrence is set in the definition as optional, required or unbounded-repeatable, but says nothing about templates dissolving when fillings are decided afresh.
“{max occurs} unbounded , if the maxOccurs [attribute] equals unbounded , otherwise the”
- A slot may be required, optional, or repeatable, and a template admitting a list of beneficiaries or an unbounded number of experimental replicates is not thereby less of a template; what dissolves the construct is a position whose admissible fillings are decided afresh on every use, because then nothing has been reused except an inclination.
Mechanisms¶
- Semantic Schema Validation
- The discipline that keeps it honest is to version the schema deliberately, keep it aligned to real requirements rather than to observed traffic, and validate before the structure is trusted.
This sourceRequires schema validation before treating a document’s structure as conforming to the constraints expressed in its XML Schema.
- The discipline that keeps it honest is to version the schema deliberately, keep it aligned to real requirements rather than to observed traffic, and validate before the structure is trusted.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:0c5f181ff9e6 · see in the full table