Interpretations of Probability¶
A., H. (2019). Interpretations of Probability. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Stochasticity vs. Determinism
- Uncertainty can arise from many sources: measurement error, incomplete information, computational intractability, or genuine indeterminacy—a taxonomy Hájek (2002) develops in his canonical survey of probability interpretations.
This sourceIn E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Canonical taxonomy of probability interpretations: separates epistemic uncertainty (ignorance about deterministic state) from ontological indeterminacy (intrinsic randomness).
- Uncertainty can arise from many sources: measurement error, incomplete information, computational intractability, or genuine indeterminacy—a taxonomy Hájek (2002) develops in his canonical survey of probability interpretations.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0c7701c0bf26 · see in the full table