Interpretations of Probability¶
A., H. (2019). Interpretations of Probability. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Stochasticity vs. Determinism
- Uncertainty can arise from many sources: measurement error, incomplete information, computational intractability, or genuine indeterminacy—a taxonomy Hájek (2002) develops in his canonical survey of probability interpretations.
This sourceIn E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Canonical taxonomy of probability interpretations: separates epistemic uncertainty (ignorance about deterministic state) from ontological indeterminacy (intrinsic randomness).
- Uncertainty can arise from many sources: measurement error, incomplete information, computational intractability, or genuine indeterminacy—a taxonomy Hájek (2002) develops in his canonical survey of probability interpretations.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0c7701c0bf26 · see in the full table