ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories¶
International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories: General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Calibration
- It presupposes three actors: the system under calibration (the instrument, model, or process), an external reference or gold standard (the accepted truth), and an adjustment mechanism (tuning parameters, retraining, recalibration), as codified by ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) for testing and calibration laboratories.
This sourceISO. International standard codifying competence, traceability to standards, and equipment calibration/maintenance for accredited testing and calibration laboratories — the establish-reference / measure-deviation / adjust / verify / monitor cycle.
- It presupposes three actors: the system under calibration (the instrument, model, or process), an external reference or gold standard (the accepted truth), and an adjustment mechanism (tuning parameters, retraining, recalibration), as codified by ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) for testing and calibration laboratories.
Mechanisms¶
- Portable Transfer Standard Comparison
- The 0.3 °C offset is inside the ±0.5 °C tolerance the process defines, so the sensor stays in service — and the whole comparison, including the reference's identity
This sourceRequires the comparison, including the reference's identity, to be recorded so the evidence is auditable and traceable.
- The 0.3 °C offset is inside the ±0.5 °C tolerance the process defines, so the sensor stays in service — and the whole comparison, including the reference's identity
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0d81a44bedd9 · see in the full table