Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth.¶
Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1995). Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Unearned Windfall Mechanism Atrophy
- The defining structural fact is that mechanism quality is trained by friction with the environment: when resources are uncoupled from performance, the mechanisms that performance would have shaped — accountability, capability, diversification — atrophy, and the system becomes brittle in proportion to its windfall.
This sourceDocuments the empirical regularity that resource-rich economies grow more slowly, the canonical statement of the resource curse.
- The defining structural fact is that mechanism quality is trained by friction with the environment: when resources are uncoupled from performance, the mechanisms that performance would have shaped — accountability, capability, diversification — atrophy, and the system becomes brittle in proportion to its windfall.
Domain-specific¶
- Paradox of Plenty (Resource Curse)
- Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner provided the cross-country econometric backbone in 1995 and 1997
This sourceNBER Working Paper 5398 (December 1995) is the cross-country econometric backbone itself: resource-export intensity in 1971 predicting slower growth over 1971-89, robust to controls for initial income, trade policy and bureaucratic efficiency - the 1997 leg of the attribution refers to the paper's revised HIID version, a separate document.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner provided the cross-country econometric backbone in 1995 and 1997
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0db35592846b · see in the full table