Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-22)¶
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2022). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-22).
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Minimax Strategy
- Minimax reasoning instead constructs an adversary set — the joint envelope of credible loads: the worst plausible combination of dead weight, live traffic, wind, seismic, and thermal stress — takes the supremum over it (the single worst combination), and minimizes the structural response under that supremum (the member sizing) with a safety factor.
This sourceCodifies LRFD load combinations — sizing members against the worst credible combination of dead, live, wind, snow, and seismic loads with calibrated factors — the structural-engineering instance of worst-case envelope design.
- Minimax reasoning instead constructs an adversary set — the joint envelope of credible loads: the worst plausible combination of dead weight, live traffic, wind, seismic, and thermal stress — takes the supremum over it (the single worst combination), and minimizes the structural response under that supremum (the member sizing) with a safety factor.
Domain-specific¶
- Protection Standard
- A protection standard is an explicit engineering and policy declaration specifying the magnitude or probability up to which a system is designed to withstand a defined hazard class — for example, a levee designed to the 1-in-100-year flood, a seismic code to a magnitude-8.5 design earthquake, a server SLA to 99.99% uptime, a fire-rated vault wall to a 4-hour torch attack.
This sourceThe definitional claim that a protection standard declares an explicit magnitude-or-probability level up to which a system is designed to withstand a named hazard class, of which a seismic code's declared design level is the canonical engineering instance.
- A protection standard is an explicit engineering and policy declaration specifying the magnitude or probability up to which a system is designed to withstand a defined hazard class — for example, a levee designed to the 1-in-100-year flood, a seismic code to a magnitude-8.5 design earthquake, a server SLA to 99.99% uptime, a fire-rated vault wall to a 4-hour torch attack.
- Structural System
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:0e545430e880 · see in the full table