Knowing when to quit¶
Lewis, C. H. (1993). Knowing when to quit: When to abandon a task and continue with another. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 3(2), 119-144.
Cited by¶
10 citations across 10 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Accommodation
This source(Bibliography-only; uncited. UNVERIFIABLE — no such article could be located in UMUAI vol. 3 (1993) or elsewhere after a genuine search; likely fabricated/mis-templated. Left link-less. See flag.)
- Affordance
This sourceUNVERIFIABLE: no article with this title/author could be confirmed in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (Clayton Lewis's known 1993 work is the book Task-Centered User Interface Design with Rieman). Left link-less; likely fabricated (FYI, tier C — never cited in body).
- Contrast
This sourceTitle/venue appear fabricated or misattributed; left link-less.
- Design Prototyping
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Gestalt Principles
This sourceBibliography only. NOTE: title/abstract should be reconfirmed against the journal; the venue and 3(2):119–144 locus match UMUAI.
- Human-Centered Accommodation
- Mental Model
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Processing Fluency
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
Domain-specific¶
- Cognitive Load
This sourceUNVERIFIED — see flag. No such article could be located; the citation appears spurious. The well-known Lewis 1993 work is Lewis & Rieman, Task-Centered User Interface Design. Left link-less.
- User-Centered Design
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 10 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:0e58af9f714a · see in the full table