Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities¶
Schoener. (1974). Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities. Science.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Riepl's Law
- It predicts the shape of the layered ecosystem, not the economic or social process that produces it in any given case. Not niche differentiation in general wearing an eponym. The abstract claim — older instances of a category re-specialize into niches a newcomer fills poorly — recurs independently in biology (niche partitioning), technology, programming languages, and tools, but those fields hold it under their own names and do not cite Riepl.
This sourceA review of resource (niche) partitioning in ecological communities, treating it as a community-level phenomenon with its own theory.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“To understand resource partitioning, essentially a community phenomenon, we require a holistic theory that draws upon models at the individual and population level.”
- It predicts the shape of the layered ecosystem, not the economic or social process that produces it in any given case. Not niche differentiation in general wearing an eponym. The abstract claim — older instances of a category re-specialize into niches a newcomer fills poorly — recurs independently in biology (niche partitioning), technology, programming languages, and tools, but those fields hold it under their own names and do not cite Riepl.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:105df71a5204 · see in the full table