Skip to content

Where A Is Ordinary

Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C. (2012). Where A Is Ordinary: The Evolution of American College and University Grading, 1940–2009. Teachers College Record, 114(7), 1-23.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
2012
Volume
114
Issue
7
Pages
1-23
DOI
10.1177/016146811211400707
DOI registrant
SAGE Publications
Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211400707
Cited from
economics_finance

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Signal Devaluation
    • Grade inflation. Average GPAs have risen steadily with concentration at the top of the scale; graduate schools and employers adapt by discounting high grades and shifting weight to alternative signals.

      This sourceDocuments the long-run rise of average GPAs and concentration of grades at the top of the scale (A's rose from ~15% of grades in 1960 to ~43% by 2009), the canonical grade-inflation evidence.

      Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

      Abstract documents A's rising to 43% of grades with GPAs saturated at the high end and of 'little use as an evaluation tool' for graduate schools and employers, but not that those audiences discount grades and shift to other signals.

      “Contemporary data indicate that, on average across a wide range of schools, A's represent 43% of all letter grades, an increase of 28 percentage points since 1960 and 12 percentage points since 1988. ... It is likely that at many selective and highly selective schools, undergraduate GPAs are now so saturated at the high end that they have little use as a motivator of students and as an evaluation tool for graduate …”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:10c72a75a756 · see in the full table