Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking¶
Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cognitive Appraisal
- The framework, developed by Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman (1984) and elaborated by Scherer, Smith, and Roseman into multi-dimensional component-process models, centers on the fundamental structural insight: stimuli do not directly produce emotion or behavior; appraisal mediates between stimulus and response, and appraisal parameters are modifiable.
This sourceComponent-process model with four stimulus-evaluation checks (relevance, implications, coping, normativity); appraisal mediates between stimulus and emotion.
- Scherer's component-process model identifies four stimulus-evaluation checks: (1) relevance—novelty, intrinsic pleasantness, goal/need conformance; (2) implications—cause, goal-conduciveness, urgency, outcome probability; (3) coping potential—control, power, adjustment; and (4) normative significance—internal and external standards.
- The framework, developed by Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman (1984) and elaborated by Scherer, Smith, and Roseman into multi-dimensional component-process models, centers on the fundamental structural insight: stimuli do not directly produce emotion or behavior; appraisal mediates between stimulus and response, and appraisal parameters are modifiable.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:11936a0322cc · see in the full table