Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking¶
Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cognitive Appraisal
- The framework, developed by Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman (1984) and elaborated by Scherer, Smith, and Roseman into multi-dimensional component-process models, centers on the fundamental structural insight: stimuli do not directly produce emotion or behavior; appraisal mediates between stimulus and response, and appraisal parameters are modifiable.
This sourceComponent-process model with four stimulus-evaluation checks (relevance, implications, coping, normativity); appraisal mediates between stimulus and emotion.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract supports a component-process model in which appraisal checks differentiate emotional states, but says nothing about modifiable appraisal parameters or the Lazarus/Folkman lineage.
“This chapter describes the sequential check theory of emotion differentiation as part of a dynamic model of emotion (the component process model of emotion). The theory attempts to explain the differentiation of emotional states as the results of a sequence of specified stimulus evaluation (appraisal) checks and makes predictions concerning the ensuing response patterning in several organismic subsystems.”
- Scherer's component-process model identifies four stimulus-evaluation checks: (1) relevance—novelty, intrinsic pleasantness, goal/need conformance; (2) implications—cause, goal-conduciveness, urgency, outcome probability; (3) coping potential—control, power, adjustment; and (4) normative significance—internal and external standards.
This sourceSame chapter as [^ref-11936a0322cc]; the four-check component-process specification cited in the Clarity section.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The chapter abstract confirms a component process model with sequential stimulus evaluation checks, but it does not name the four checks or their subcomponents, so the detailed taxonomy remains unverified.
“The theory attempts to explain the differentiation of emotional states as the results of a sequence of specified stimulus evaluation (appraisal) checks”
- The framework, developed by Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman (1984) and elaborated by Scherer, Smith, and Roseman into multi-dimensional component-process models, centers on the fundamental structural insight: stimuli do not directly produce emotion or behavior; appraisal mediates between stimulus and response, and appraisal parameters are modifiable.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:11936a0322cc · see in the full table