Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience.¶
Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience. Engineering Within Ecological Constraints.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Adaptive Capacity
This sourceDistinguishes engineering resilience (speed of return to a single equilibrium) from ecological resilience (magnitude of disturbance absorbed before regime shift); foundational for the typology of resilience meanings.
- Resilience
- Three dominant frameworks have emerged in contemporary usage: engineering resilience (fast return to prior equilibrium), ecological resilience (persistence within a regime despite perturbation), and adaptive resilience (capacity to reorganize and maintain essential function while transforming structure), a typology articulated by Holling (1996) and extended by Folke (2006)
This sourceDistinguishes engineering resilience (speed of return to a single equilibrium) from ecological resilience (magnitude of disturbance absorbed before regime shift); foundational for the typology of resilience meanings.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Holling (1996) defines engineering vs ecological resilience; it does not articulate a third 'adaptive resilience' framework, and Folke (2006) is not in this chapter.
“In this case the measurement of resilience is the magnitude of disturbance that can be absorbed before the system changes its structure”
- Three dominant frameworks have emerged in contemporary usage: engineering resilience (fast return to prior equilibrium), ecological resilience (persistence within a regime despite perturbation), and adaptive resilience (capacity to reorganize and maintain essential function while transforming structure), a typology articulated by Holling (1996) and extended by Folke (2006)
- Stability
- Holling's distinction between engineering resilience (return rate) and ecological resilience (basin size) moved from forest ecology into climate adaptation and critical-infrastructure protection.
This sourceSharpens the return-rate versus basin-size distinction migrating into climate adaptation and infrastructure protection.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Defines engineering resilience (speed of return to equilibrium) versus ecological resilience (disturbance absorbed before a regime shift); says nothing of its spread into climate adaptation or infrastructure protection.
“the measurement of resilience is the magnitude of disturbance that can be absorbed before the system changes its structure”
- Holling's distinction between engineering resilience (return rate) and ecological resilience (basin size) moved from forest ecology into climate adaptation and critical-infrastructure protection.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:11a15d6b6b33 · see in the full table