The Logic of the History of Ideas.¶
Bevir, M. (1994). The Logic of the History of Ideas. History and Theory, 33(3), 262-275.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Presentism
- It is not Anachronism (#270) — presentism and anachronism are a tight pair, with presentism naming the evaluative/interpretive failure and anachronism naming the concrete importation of present artifacts or concepts into past description; they are structurally related but refer to different manifestations.
This sourceMethodological account of how historians of ideas can recover the meaning of past utterances without importing present conceptual schemes — articulates the discipline of presentism-resistant interpretation.
- It is not Anachronism (#270) — presentism and anachronism are a tight pair, with presentism naming the evaluative/interpretive failure and anachronism naming the concrete importation of present artifacts or concepts into past description; they are structurally related but refer to different manifestations.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1278ab7419b9 · see in the full table