Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment¶
Colton, R. H., & Casper. (2011). Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment: A Physiological Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Voice
- A healthy voice has a stable, near-periodic glottal waveform with low jitter, low shimmer, and high HNR; disordered voices — from vocal-fold nodules, polyps, paralysis, Reinke's oedema, muscle-tension dysphonia, laryngeal cancer — show elevated perturbation measures, reduced HNR, reduced frequency or intensity range, and perceptually distinctive quality changes (hoarseness, breathiness, roughness, strain) that are the presenting complaint in voice disorders
This sourceA clinical voice text using jitter, shimmer and harmonics-to-noise ratio as the acoustic signs distinguishing a normal from a disordered voice. A clinical voice text whose diagnostic table classifies muscle-tension dysphonia as functional with normal tissue and places spasmodic dysphonia among functional/neurogenic laryngeal disorders.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“represent variation in vocal fold mass, [tension], [muscle] activity, or neural activity”
- A healthy voice has a stable, near-periodic glottal waveform with low jitter, low shimmer, and high HNR; disordered voices — from vocal-fold nodules, polyps, paralysis, Reinke's oedema, muscle-tension dysphonia, laryngeal cancer — show elevated perturbation measures, reduced HNR, reduced frequency or intensity range, and perceptually distinctive quality changes (hoarseness, breathiness, roughness, strain) that are the presenting complaint in voice disorders
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:128ff343ee33 · see in the full table