Matter of Evans v City of Saratoga Springs¶
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department. (2022). Matter of Evans v City of Saratoga Springs.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Geographic Zoning Map
- Its failure modes follow from the same force: because the line gates real value, it invites spot zoning — bending a boundary to single out one parcel for treatment the surrounding pattern does not justify, i.e. a boundary reverse-engineered to a wanted outcome.
This sourceDefines spot zoning as singling out a parcel for a different classification to benefit its owner rather than implementing the comprehensive plan.
- Its failure modes follow from the same force: because the line gates real value, it invites spot zoning — bending a boundary to single out one parcel for treatment the surrounding pattern does not justify, i.e. a boundary reverse-engineered to a wanted outcome.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:12bd160f4d8b · see in the full table