Quantum entanglement.

Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009). Quantum entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 865-942.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2009

Volume

81

Issue

2

Pages

865-942

DOI

10.1103/revmodphys.81.865

DOI registrant

American Physical Society

Link

https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

Cited from

physics

Cited by

3 citations across 3 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Entanglement
  • Failure mode: practitioners treat the resource-theoretic view as exhaustive, missing deeper questions about the nature of quantum correlations; conversely, philosophers treat operational success as irrelevant to metaphysical questions, disconnecting abstract foundational work from the empirical phenomena.

    This sourcecomprehensive review covering entanglement definitions, measures, Bell inequalities, multipartite entanglement, and the resource-theoretic vs foundational framings discussed in tension T6.

Domain-specific

• Peres–Horodecki criterion
  • … identity and a convenient observable transfers from The partial transpose of a Bell-state density matrix has a negative eigenvalue, certifying entanglement. to A noisy two-qubit state's partial transpose is diagonalized; negativity certifies entanglement, while positivity in that dimension proves separability..
• Reduction criterion
  • … distinction between constitutive identity and a convenient observable transfers from A maximally entangled pure state has maximally mixed marginals but gives a negative direction for a reduction operator. to A mixed state that violates reduction can, under the relevant bipartite setting, be linked to distillability..

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:1307ade4aca7 · see in the full table