Environmental taxation and the double dividend¶
Goulder, L. H. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a reader's guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), 157-183.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Externality
- Further, the empirical existence of a "strong" double dividend (pollution reduction and net efficiency gain) remains contested (Goulder 1995 found limited evidence for the strong dividend; later work has found stronger evidence when pre-existing distortions are large or dynamic effects are incorporated)
This sourceSurvey of the double-dividend literature finding limited empirical support for a strong double dividend in most settings. SUPPORTS the 'Goulder 1995 found limited evidence for the strong dividend' claim in T5 (151). [Page range corrected from 155–183 to 157–183.]
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Goulder's abstract confirms limited, mixed evidence for a strong double dividend, but a 1995 paper cannot support the sentence's uncited 'later work has found stronger evidence' clause.
“Theoretical analyses and numerical results tend to cast doubt on the strong double-dividend claim, although the theoretical case is not air-tight and the numerical evidence is mixed.”
- Further, the empirical existence of a "strong" double dividend (pollution reduction and net efficiency gain) remains contested (Goulder 1995 found limited evidence for the strong dividend; later work has found stronger evidence when pre-existing distortions are large or dynamic effects are incorporated)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:15ad7a6e1548 · see in the full table