Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace.¶
Nye, J. S. (2017). Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace. International Security, 41(3), 44-71.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Deterrence
- Cybersecurity is the same skeleton in a different substrate: visible response capabilities, attribution threats, indictments, and sanctions aim to alter an attacker's cost-benefit, and the criminological finding transfers directly — broadcasting attribution capability (raising the attacker's perceived probability of being identified) shifts attacker behaviour more than escalating declared penalties (magnitude).
This sourceAnalyzes cyber deterrence and the attribution problem — how raising an attacker's perceived probability of identification and response shifts cost-benefit more than escalating declared penalties.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Nye supports that indictments, sanctions threats and public retaliatory capability aim to change attacker cost-benefit, but not that raising perceived detection probability beats raising penalties.
“The costs of naming and shaming, however, plus the threat of further U.S. sanctions that was floated during the summer of 2015, seem to have changed Chinese behavior.”
- Cybersecurity is the same skeleton in a different substrate: visible response capabilities, attribution threats, indictments, and sanctions aim to alter an attacker's cost-benefit, and the criminological finding transfers directly — broadcasting attribution capability (raising the attacker's perceived probability of being identified) shifts attacker behaviour more than escalating declared penalties (magnitude).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:16d6fc1a9036 · see in the full table