A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry¶
Quintana, C., Reiser, Davis, Krajcik, Fretz, Duncan, Kyza, et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337-386.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Inquiry-Based Learning
- Scaffolds support each phase — formulation scaffolds, investigation scaffolds, interpretation scaffolds, argument scaffolds — and instruction is typically iterative across inquiry cycles over days or weeks, a phase-by-phase scaffolding architecture Quintana, Reiser, Davis, Krajcik, Fretz, Duncan, Kyza, Edelson, and Soloway (2004) systematize as a design framework for inquiry-supporting software.
This sourceSystematic phase-by-phase scaffolding architecture for inquiry — formulation, investigation, interpretation, argumentation — operationalized through software tools that support each step of the iterative inquiry cycle.
- Scaffolds support each phase — formulation scaffolds, investigation scaffolds, interpretation scaffolds, argument scaffolds — and instruction is typically iterative across inquiry cycles over days or weeks, a phase-by-phase scaffolding architecture Quintana, Reiser, Davis, Krajcik, Fretz, Duncan, Kyza, Edelson, and Soloway (2004) systematize as a design framework for inquiry-supporting software.
- Scaffolding
- Soloway, Guzdial, and Hay (1994) had earlier sketched the design space for software scaffolding in programming education, and Quintana, Reiser, Davis, and Krajcik (2004) generalized this into a software scaffolding design framework grounded in learner-centered principles.
This sourceProposes a generalizable framework for embedding scaffolding into learning software, organized around process, sense-making, articulation, and reflection.
- Soloway, Guzdial, and Hay (1994) had earlier sketched the design space for software scaffolding in programming education, and Quintana, Reiser, Davis, and Krajcik (2004) generalized this into a software scaffolding design framework grounded in learner-centered principles.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1720bc818430 · see in the full table