Politics in Time¶
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Critical Juncture
- The critical juncture is therefore not the lock-in itself, but the moment of high sensitivity where small causes produce large and divergent effects.
This sourceDevelops positive feedback, increasing returns, and path dependence in detail, showing how early arrangements become self-reinforcing and progressively harder to reverse; supports the lock-in/increasing-returns claim.
- The critical juncture is therefore not the lock-in itself, but the moment of high sensitivity where small causes produce large and divergent effects.
- Institution
- It supports reasoning about reproduction: an institution survives personnel turnover, so an intervention that targets individuals while leaving the rule-complex intact will see the old behavior regenerate.
This sourceDevelops the framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time: shows how beneficiaries of existing institutional arrangements (including regulatory voids during lag) lobby against catch-up regulation, creating contentious timing of institutional adjustment.
- It supports reasoning about reproduction: an institution survives personnel turnover, so an intervention that targets individuals while leaving the rule-complex intact will see the old behavior regenerate.
- Institutional Lag
- This creates political resistance to catch-up regulation, as beneficiaries of lag lobby against closure, an outcome Pierson (2004) analyzes through his framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time.
This sourceDevelops the framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time: shows how beneficiaries of existing institutional arrangements (including regulatory voids during lag) lobby against catch-up regulation, creating contentious timing of institutional adjustment.
- This creates political resistance to catch-up regulation, as beneficiaries of lag lobby against closure, an outcome Pierson (2004) analyzes through his framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1731aeaac54d · see in the full table