Politics in Time¶
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Critical Juncture
- The critical juncture is therefore not the lock-in itself, but the moment of high sensitivity where small causes produce large and divergent effects.
This sourceDevelops positive feedback, increasing returns, and path dependence in detail, showing how early arrangements become self-reinforcing and progressively harder to reverse; supports the lock-in/increasing-returns claim.
- The critical juncture is therefore not the lock-in itself, but the moment of high sensitivity where small causes produce large and divergent effects.
- Institution
- It supports reasoning about reproduction: an institution survives personnel turnover, so an intervention that targets individuals while leaving the rule-complex intact will see the old behavior regenerate.
This sourceDevelops the framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time: shows how beneficiaries of existing institutional arrangements (including regulatory voids during lag) lobby against catch-up regulation, creating contentious timing of institutional adjustment.
- It supports reasoning about reproduction: an institution survives personnel turnover, so an intervention that targets individuals while leaving the rule-complex intact will see the old behavior regenerate.
- Institutional Lag
- This creates political resistance to catch-up regulation, as beneficiaries of lag lobby against closure, an outcome Pierson (2004) analyzes through his framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time.
This sourceDevelops the framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time: shows how beneficiaries of existing institutional arrangements (including regulatory voids during lag) lobby against catch-up regulation, creating contentious timing of institutional adjustment.
- This creates political resistance to catch-up regulation, as beneficiaries of lag lobby against closure, an outcome Pierson (2004) analyzes through his framework of self-reinforcing political dynamics over time.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1731aeaac54d · see in the full table