Augmentative and Alternative Communication¶
Beukelman, & Mirenda. (2012). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. Brookes Publishing.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
- AAC is organised along two distinctions, the second nested in the first: the aided versus unaided division (unaided: manual signs, gesture, eye-gaze, pointing; aided: any external tool) and, within the aided branch, a low-technology versus high-technology division (low-tech: communication boards, picture exchange systems, alphabet boards, Bliss symbols; high-tech: speech-generating devices with dynamic-display screens, eye-tracking interfaces, switch-scanning systems, brain-computer interfaces)
This sourceIs the standard source for the aided/unaided distinction and for low-tech versus high-tech as a subdivision of aided AAC - and it contradicts the sentence's 'two orthogonal axes' framing. Covers core-versus-fringe vocabulary selection, page-set organisation for navigational efficiency, and the standard graphic symbol sets.
- AAC is organised along two distinctions, the second nested in the first: the aided versus unaided division (unaided: manual signs, gesture, eye-gaze, pointing; aided: any external tool) and, within the aided branch, a low-technology versus high-technology division (low-tech: communication boards, picture exchange systems, alphabet boards, Bliss symbols; high-tech: speech-generating devices with dynamic-display screens, eye-tracking interfaces, switch-scanning systems, brain-computer interfaces)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:174d1cfe2ccf · see in the full table