An Empirical Study of the Reliability of UNIX Utilities.¶
Miller, B. P., Fredriksen, L., & So, B. (1990). An Empirical Study of the Reliability of UNIX Utilities. Communications of the ACM, 32-44.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Fuzzing
- In software security it is coverage-guided fuzzers that have found tens of thousands of bugs in widely-deployed code.
This sourceCoins "fuzz" testing — feeding random inputs through normal interfaces to crash programs — and reports widespread failures (about 24% of utilities), the origin of fuzzing.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The 1990 origin paper describes random-character (non-coverage-guided) fuzzing of UNIX utilities that crashed on bug-triggering input, but reports neither coverage guidance nor a bug count in the tens of thousands.
“These tools include the fuzz (random character) generator, ptyjig (to test interactive utilities), and scripts to automate the testing process.”
- In software security it is coverage-guided fuzzers that have found tens of thousands of bugs in widely-deployed code.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:177fb6a9c472 · see in the full table