Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance¶
Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Conflict of Interest
- The Cadbury Report (1992) on the financial aspects of corporate governance generalized this insight by formalizing structural separations — independent non-executive directors, separation of chair and CEO, audit committees — as portable mechanisms applicable wherever fiduciary tension recurs.
This sourceThe Cadbury Report; its recommendations on non-executive directors, independent audit committees, and external-auditor independence became the template for modern corporate-governance codes worldwide. Live-verified (ECGI canonical PDF).
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Cadbury recommends non-executive directors, a chair/CEO split and audit committees for UK boards; it does not frame them as portable mechanisms for fiduciary tension generally.
“Given the importance and particular nature of the chairman’s role, it should in principle be separate from that of the chief executive.”
- The Cadbury Report (1992) on the financial aspects of corporate governance generalized this insight by formalizing structural separations — independent non-executive directors, separation of chair and CEO, audit committees — as portable mechanisms applicable wherever fiduciary tension recurs.
- Governance
- Governance is architecture, not content—captured in Cadbury's (1992) canonical formulation of governance as "the system by which companies are directed and controlled."
This sourceThe Cadbury Report; paragraph 2.5 gives the canonical definition of corporate governance as 'the system by which companies are directed and controlled,' the formulation quoted in the prime, and its recommendations on non-executive directors and audit committees became the template for modern corporate-governance codes.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Paragraph 2.5 gives the quoted definition verbatim; the report does not frame governance as architecture rather than content.
“2.5 Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and controlled. Boards of directors are responsible for the governance of their companies.”
- Governance is architecture, not content—captured in Cadbury's (1992) canonical formulation of governance as "the system by which companies are directed and controlled."
- Separation of Powers
- In theory, the board acts as shareholder representative and executive restraint mechanism; the audit committee acts as internal watchdog; external auditors (independent firms hired by the board, not management) provide additional verification—a configuration codified in the Cadbury Report (1992), whose recommendations on the role of non-executive directors, independent audit committees, and external auditor independence became the template for modern corporate governance codes.
This sourceThe Cadbury Report; its recommendations on the role of non-executive directors, the composition and remit of independent audit committees, and the independence of external auditors became the template for modern corporate governance codes worldwide.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The report recommends non-executive directors, independent-majority audit committees and auditor independence, but it does not claim to be a template, and has shareholders appointing auditors.
“Membership should be confined to the non-executive directors of the company and a majority of the non-”
- In theory, the board acts as shareholder representative and executive restraint mechanism; the audit committee acts as internal watchdog; external auditors (independent firms hired by the board, not management) provide additional verification—a configuration codified in the Cadbury Report (1992), whose recommendations on the role of non-executive directors, independent audit committees, and external auditor independence became the template for modern corporate governance codes.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 3 of 3 citations: 3 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:178d21af7e6c · see in the full table