On Lord's Paradox¶
Holland, P. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). On Lord's Paradox. Principals of Modern Psychological Measurement: A Festschrift for Frederic M. Lord (Wainer & Messick, eds), Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Lord's Paradox
- The contradiction is not error but a difference in estimand, driven by the fact that sex causally determines initial body composition
This sourceHolland and Rubin's 'On Lord's Paradox' treats the contradiction as a difference in causal quantities in causal studies rather than an analytic error.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Twenty-five years have elapsed since Lord first put forth his perplexing paradox.”
- The contradiction is not error but a difference in estimand, driven by the fact that sex causally determines initial body composition
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:17e468611e91 · see in the full table